Benjamin Hannestad vs Ki Lung Ng Estadísticas cara a cara, resultados y comparación de rendimiento
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
L L W W W W L W W L
Form
W L L W L W W L L LCara A Cara: Hannestad 1 - 0 Ng
Ellas han jugado 2 conjuntos en total, con Hannestad victoriosa 2 y Ng victoriosa 0. El último partido entre Hannestad y Ng fue en el M15 Sharm ElSheikh, el 08-10-2024, Cuartos de Q3, Hard, con Benjamin Hannestad obteniendo la victoria 6-3 6-4
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Benjamin Hannestad | 1 |
Ki Lung Ng | 0 |
M15 Sharm ElSheikh(08-10-2024)
6
3
6
4
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Medvedev VS Cerundolo PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Alexandrova VS Kasatkina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
GANADOR | PERDEDOR | MARCADOR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Benjamin Hannestad
Player
Ki Lung Ng
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
0
Aces
5
-
Double Faults
-
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
50
|
Estadísticas | ||
---|---|---|
1 | Partidos cara a cara | 0 |
2 | Sets Ganados | 0 |
12 | Juegos Ganados | 7 |
0 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
0 | Faltas dobles totales | 0 |
1:36:0 | Tiempo promedio de partido | 1:36:0 |
65% (43/66) | % De Primer Servicio | 59% (26/44) |
74% (32/43) | % De Pts Ganados Con 1st Serv. | 81% (21/26) |
61% (14/23) | % De Pts Ganados Con 2nd Serv. | 50% (9/18) |
67% (2/3) | Puntos de quiebre ganados % (total) | 0% (0/6) |
32% (14/44) | % de ganancia de puntos devueltos | 30% (20/66) |
100% (1/1) | La mejor de 3 sets gana % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | La mejor de 5 sets gana % | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | % de victorias en desempates (total) | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | % De Sets Decisivos Ganados | 0% (0/0) |
100% (1/1) | 1er set ganado, partido ganado | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1er set ganado, partido perdido | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1er set perdido, partido ganado | 0% (1/0) |
Las estadísticas mostradas actualmente incluyen partidos de todos los niveles. Para excluir eventos de nivel inferior (según las estadísticas oficiales de ATP / WTA), usa el botón de alternar en el pie de página.
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Benjamin Hannestad
Before:
OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 7-6(8) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Benjamin Hannestad
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Benjamin Hannestad
Player
Dragos Nicolae Cazacu
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
51%
(
40 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
78
|
0-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Benjamin Hannestad
Player
Andreas Timini
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
58 of
84)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
25%
(
7 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
54%
(
44 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
48 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 2-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Harry Wendelken
Player
Benjamin Hannestad
60%
(
9 of
15)
1st Serve %
40%
(
4 of
10)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
6 of
9)
1st Serve Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
13
Total Points Won
12
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H |
Ver Más
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Ki Lung Ng
Before:
OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Gabriel Diallo
Player
Ki Lung Ng
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Aliaksandr Liaonenka
Player
Ki Lung Ng
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
9
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
89%
(
31 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
22%
(
13 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Ki Lung Ng
Player
Jack Cheng
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve %
40%
(
23 of
57)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
18 of
23)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
57
|
3-6 6-2 12-10 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Ki Lung Ng
Player
Tsihon Fedorov
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Yongming Zhang
Player
Ki Lung Ng
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Ki Lung Ng
Player
Zi Hui Chen
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
4-6 6-1 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Benjamin Hannestad
Player
Ki Lung Ng
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
0
Aces
5
-
Double Faults
-
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H |
Ver Más

Desglose De Estadísticas Contra Todos Los Oponentes H2H
Estadísticas | ||
---|---|---|
59% (94/66) | Win/Loss | 42% (41/56) |
58% (202/149) | Sets Win/Loss | 42% (90/122) |
54% (1733/1466) | Games Win/Loss | 48% (988/1053) |
59% (53/37) | Hard Win/Loss | 43% (39/52) |
58% (29/21) | Clay Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) |
60% (12/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
143 | Aces Total | 110 |
0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
253 | Total Double Faults | 122 |
1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
310.9 | Average Opponent Rank | 248.04 |
62% (3034/4892) | 1st Serve % | 61% (1594/2623) |
63% (1901/3034) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (1012/1594) |
46% (847/1858) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (468/1029) |
44% (242/555) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (97/249) |
43% (1987/4665) | Return Points Win % | 39% (1013/2621) |
0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
33% (1/2) | Cups W/L | 33% (1/2) |
0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/2) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
60% (93/62) | Futures W/L | 43% (40/53) |
60% (92/154) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 43% (41/96) |
0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
57% (21/37) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 30% (3/10) |
54% (19/35) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (11/19) |
89% (94/84) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (38/31) |
9% (94/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (38/6) |
15% (66/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (59/10) |
Otras predicciones
- Loading news...